The company had several clear goals for the nuBeam system: minimised exposure rates, highest radiation safety for the clinical staff, and the least possible downtime and risk to staff while servicing and maintaining the system. Furthermore, the entire BNCT beam system had to fit within several rooms of a traditional radiation therapy clinic — with 230 m2 needed for the device’s equipment and an additional 110 m2 of ancillary space.
The aim for the optimised neutron beam was also to allow for significantly shorter treatment times for patients than with previous BNCT devices, with at most two treatment fractions needed for complete therapy.
nuBeam is now a clinical solution for boron neutron capture therapy with all components necessary for imaging, treatment planning, patient positioning and treatment. The system’s source uses a 2.6 MeV electrostatic proton accelerator operating at 30 mA and a rotating, solid lithium target for generating a homogenous beam of epithermal neutrons.
The beam-shaping assembly and a neutron generating target also provide shielding to protect the patient and staff. A positioning robot and in-room CT scanner provide image-guided treatment in real-time.
BNCT in Helsinki
Finland has been a European hotspot of BNCT trials since 1992 but had to close down its FiR 1 nuclear reactor in 2012 due to costs. The excitement is returning to the Finnish oncology community with the installation of Europe’s first accelerator-based BNCT system – the nuBeam solution — at the Helsinki University Hospital. It is currently operating daily for verification and validation testing, with the first clinical trials expected to begin in 2023.
Safety during target exchange was another critical consideration during the design of nuBeam. The system makes the lithium target exchange secure, cost-effective and routine. It utilises its ceiling-mounted patient-positioning robot to remove the spent targets, place them in the lead line storage bins for disposal, and then fit new targets.
This elegant solution eliminates technician exposure and interferes with the treatment schedule the least. Spent targets need to be handled with caution and stored for a while before they can be reconditioned and reused.
Dr Reczek concludes that the extensive testing at the Helsinki University site has demonstrated nuBeam’s capability to sustain the target proton current for extended periods, up to 20 to 40 hours per week, for sixteen consecutive months.
Recent BNCT drug development and use overview
The Chief Medical Officer at Neutron Therapeutics, Dr Seppo Pakala concentrated on a general overview of boron-10 delivery carriers by emphasising their fundamental requirements.
Treatment with boron-10 carriers yields a therapeutic effect only when we achieve a high enough boron-10 concentration in the cancer cells of the specifically targeted tumours.
Of course, the targeted cells must also retain high enough levels of boron-10 concentration to allow efficient neutron irradiation. On the other hand, the boron-10 load to normal cells should be very low, and its clearance from blood rapid to avoid harmful effects in normal tissue. Clinical trials show that a therapeutic effect can be achieved if the carrier content in the tumour is at least three times higher than in normal tissue.
The challenge for developers of the novel delivery substances is now to satisfy the clinical-use requirements as soon as possible. These agents will achieve much higher tumour-to-normal tissue ratios, with which we could shorten the iteration time and treat more patients per day.
Clinical requirements for New Delivery Carriers
Today’s most commonly used boron-10 carrier, boronophenylalanine (BPA) fructose, is produced in hospital pharmacies separately for each patient and with quality verification of each batch, which is time-consuming. New boron-10 carriers should be registered drugs with long shelf-life, produced with good manufacturing practice (GMP), with no extra workload for pharmacies, easily administered to the patient and with no need for supplementary treatments.
Additionally, boron-10 dosing could be improved by moving from 18F-labeling of BPA to direct, in vivo detection of boron-10 concentration in tumour cells. The growth of the installed base of accelerator-based BNCT devices and the number of efficient clinical teams worldwide is reaching critical mass for BNCT adoption in conventional cancer therapy. The expansion of indications for BNCT will also make pharma companies more interested in boron-10 carrier development. Two companies actively developing new boron-10 carriers are TAE Life Sciences and Tenboron.
The Finnish Tenboron has three carriers in its development pipeline — a BPA-like non-specific carrier, a tumour-protein targeted carrier for glioblastoma, and the antibody boron conjugate for HER2 positive tumours, the TB0010. The latter is the furthest in the pipeline and has been successfully tested in pre-clinical studies in xenograft mice and rats, achieving in-tumour tissue concentrations of 40 ug/g to 100 ug/g. With a tumour-to-blood ratio above 90 and an in-tumour retention time longer than a day, TB0010 is now ready for Phase 1 studies.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!